in the way Greenwood Roche operates. From the outset we have focused on clearly defined specialist areas, retaining highly respected legal experts in each field. We then take that further; ensuring clients have direct and regular access to the most senior partners and lawyers, in a cost efficient manner.
Close contact with experts and clear cost advantages
We advise on a range of significant public and private sector projects. To ensure our specialists are always where they’re needed, we operate as one office with hubs in Auckland, Wellington & Christchurch.
Recent Projects
Projects
The Greenwood Roche resource management team, led by Partner Francelle Lupis, has assisted Generus...
The Greenwood Roche resource management team, led by Partner Francelle Lupis, has assisted Generus Living Group to obtain fast-track consent under the COVID-19 Recovery (Fast-track Consenting) Act 2020 for the construction of the 13-storey Pearson Residences building in Parnell, Auckland.
The Pearson Residences building is the third and final stage of The Foundation, a $500 million retirement village in central Auckland, designed by Peddlethorp architects and officially opened by the Prime Minister in March this year.
Pearson Residences is located in the centre of the Foundation precinct, surrounded by Foundation Building 1 and Building 2, Birthcare, Pearson House, ACG Parnell College, the Jubilee Hall and Foundation on George Street building. The resource consent authorises the construction of the 48m central building, containing 65 retirement units and care facilities, a range of resident amenities, two levels of basement carparking, landscaping and a pedestrian airbridge connecting to Building 2.
Brigid McArthur and Vimal Nair have recently completed for Rio Tinto and New Zealand Aluminium...
Brigid McArthur and Vimal Nair have recently completed for Rio Tinto and New Zealand Aluminium Smelters a suite of new 20-year electricity contracts, including ground-breaking demand response contracts.
The new deal ensures the Tiwai Point aluminium smelter remains open after years of uncertainty around its future, a massive relief for employees, Southland and Tiwai’s many stakeholders.
This uncertainty has long unsettled NZ energy markets and deterred investment in new renewable generation.
The overall deal replaces NZAS’ previous Electricity Agreement with Meridian Energy, a long‑term contract for differences providing NZAS with hedge cover for up to 572 MW.
Under the new arrangements, hedge cover for up to 572 MW in aggregate is provided by three different generators (Meridian Energy, Contact Energy and Mercury NZ) through a portfolio of different CfDs. The challenge was to ensure the rights and obligations, risks and operational management of the different contracts work alongside each other seamlessly, having regard to the separation between them.
NZAS is the country’s single largest electricity consumer, taking around 13% of NZ’s electricity supply. The new deal also includes separate contracts with Meridian and Contact that enable them to call on NZAS for various different tranches of demand response. In effect, NZAS can be required to dial back production when there is a shortage of power in the grid. The smelter therefore acts as a battery for the NZ electricity system, ensuring the lights are kept on when NZ needs it most.
On 22 July 2024 resource consents and a notice of requirement were granted / approved under the...
On 22 July 2024 resource consents and a notice of requirement were granted / approved under the COVID-19 Recovery (Fast-track Consenting) Act 2020 authorising the construction of the ancillary services facilities that will support the operation of the New Dunedin Hospital - Whakatuputupu.
Resource consent was granted for the stage 1 foundation works on 23 December 2021, for the stage 2 Outpatient building on 17 August 2022 and for the stage 3 Inpatient building on 24 November 2023. This fourth and final stage of the consenting process will authorise the construction and operation of supplementary, ancillary services facilities necessary for the operation of the two main clinical buildings – the Inpatient and Outpatient buildings.
The facilities will comprise a generator building, a heat pump/chiller enclosure, a services gantry extending over Castle Street and connecting to the Inpatient building, and associated equipment including two diesel storage tanks. They are to be located on the “Bow Lane” block to the east across Castle Street from the main facilities which are located on the “Cadbury” and “Wilson” blocks. Construction works are set to begin on the facilities within the coming months.
A team from Greenwood Roche led by Rachel Murdoch and Francelle Lupis are advising Te Whatu Ora on all consenting matters relating to the New Dunedin Hospital.
Greenwood Roche recently acted for New Zealand Rural Land Company Limited (NZRLC) in relation to a...
Greenwood Roche recently acted for New Zealand Rural Land Company Limited (NZRLC) in relation to a restructure of its property portfolio.
The project involved transferring 14,487 hectares of rural land, predominantly dairy and forestry, and all interests and property rights held in relation to those properties, from NZRLC’s subsidiary, NZRLC Dairy Holdings Limited, to a new limited partnership, New Zealand Rural Land Investments Limited Partnership.
The transfer to New Zealand Rural Land Investments Limited Partnership was to facilitate NZRLC selling a 25% equity interest in its land portfolio to Roc Partners (an Australian specialist private markets investment manager) for NZ$44.2m. Greenwood Roche also successfully acted for NZRLC on the property and finance aspects of the sale to Roc Partners.
The Greenwood Roche team was led by Jeannie Warnock (Partner), Anthony Staples (Partner), Kurt McRedmond (Senior Associate), Tom Petersen (Lawyer) and Georgie Pay (Lawyer) with specialist input from other lawyers within the firm.
On 24 November 2023 resource consent was granted under the COVID-19 Recovery (Fast-track Consenting)...
On 24 November 2023 resource consent was granted under the COVID-19 Recovery (Fast-track Consenting) Act 2020 for the above-ground construction works and subsequent operation of the new Inpatient building at Dunedin Hospital.
Resource consent was granted for the stage 1 foundation works on 23 December 2021 and for the stage 2 Outpatient building on 17 August 2022. The granting of this subsequent consent will enable the establishment of the new Inpatient building, the largest of the clinical buildings comprising the new Dunedin Hospital.
As the primary tertiary healthcare facility for the Southern region, the new Inpatient building will house a range of consultation and treatment spaces, including an intensive care unit, a dedicated primary birthing unit and an expanded emergency department. In addition to the dedicated clinical facilities, the Inpatient building site will also accommodate generous areas of landscaping and public realm extending primarily along the Cumberland Street frontage of the site. Works on the Inpatient building are anticipated to commence in Q1 2024.
A team from Greenwood Roche, led by Julian Smith, Monique Thomas and Rachel Murdoch, are advising Te Whatu Ora on all consenting and property matters relating to the New Dunedin Hospital.
On 26 July 2023 an expert consenting panel granted Hughes Developments Limited’s Faringdon Oval...
On 26 July 2023 an expert consenting panel granted Hughes Developments Limited’s Faringdon Oval application under the COVID-19 Recovery (Fast-track Consenting) Act 2020.
Faringdon Oval is a 69.3ha extension of the existing, well established Faringdon community in Rolleston, which has developed over the last decade under the Operative Selwyn District Plan, the Housing Accords and Special Housing Areas Act 2013, and more recently, the COVID-19 Recovery (Fast Track Consenting) Act 2020.
The Fast Track consent for Faringdon Oval authorises the subdivision, land use and associated activities needed to facilitate the addition of 684 residential units to the Rolleston housing supply with an additional 462 residential units to be enabled through super lots with minimum density requirements. The development will support a range of residential housing types and densities, high quality landscaping, open space reserves, a neighbourhood centre and a network of transport links to existing residential areas and the Rolleston town centre.
Greenwood Roche is delighted to have assisted HDL in delivering a development that will contribute significant housing supply in such a strategic location for the wider Canterbury region.
On 28 July 2023 the Dunedin City Council granted a variation to the conditions of the previously...
On 28 July 2023 the Dunedin City Council granted a variation to the conditions of the previously consented enabling works for the New Dunedin Hospital.
The variation provides for changes in the location and footprint of the proposed Inpatient Building which will be housed on the old Cadbury factory site. The variation also accommodates a new plant building between the Inpatient Building and the southern site boundary, and technical construction related changes such as updated pile designs and driving methodology for the Inpatient Building and its two link bridges.
Enabling works for the Outpatient Building are complete and above-ground construction has begun with a target ‘go-live’ date of 2025. Enabling works are underway for the significantly larger Inpatient Building which is scheduled to ‘go-live’ in 2029. The resource consent application to authorise the above-ground construction and operation of the Inpatient Building has now been lodged with the Environmental Protection Authority for referral to an expert consenting panel under the COVID-19 Recovery (Fast-track Consenting) Act 2020. Subject to securing all necessary approvals, construction of that Building is scheduled to begin in Q1 2024.
The Greenwood Roche team has been advising Te Whatu Ora on the resource management and property aspects of the New Dunedin Hospital project since 2017.
Greenwood Roche recently acted for Bei Group Limited on Plan Change 59: Albany 10 Precinct to the...
Greenwood Roche recently acted for Bei Group Limited on Plan Change 59: Albany 10 Precinct to the Auckland Unitary Plan (Operative in Part), securing appropriate zoning and plan provisions to develop a comprehensive residential development, which will enable 1,800 dwellings in buildings up to ten storeys on part of the old Massey Campus, near the Albany town centre.
We advised Bei Group through the initial application, including notification and hearing phases and, following approval of the plan change, an appeal by Kristin School to the Environment Court largely in respect of transport matters. Concurrently, Greenwood Roche provided advice on conflicts between Auckland Council’s Plan Change 78 (Intensification Planning Instruments required by the National Policy Statement Urban Development) and proposed Variation 3 to the Auckland Unitary Plan. Ultimately Variation 3 was withdrawn by the Council and the appeal was resolved. On 9 December 2022, Auckland Council’s planning committee approved the operative status of the Plan Change, with formal notification to follow in early 2023.
Bei Group Limited can now progress its vision for its 13.7ha site at 473 Albany Highway - to create a vibrant, diverse and high-quality residential neighbourhood, with a range of housing typologies that will be supported by a new internal street network, quality public open space and a commercial hub to service resident demand. Greenwood Roche is delighted with this outcome and is looking forward to watching this exemplar development come to life.
News & Insights
Insights
In a recent slew of announcements, the Government has unveiled transformative reforms aimed at...
In a recent slew of announcements, the Government has unveiled transformative reforms aimed at streamlining the building consent system and boosting efficiency in New Zealand’s struggling building sector.
On 29 September 2024, the Minister for Building and Construction, Chris Penk, announced that the Government is beginning to investigate options for a major reform to building consenting.
The Government considers this reform necessary to combat increasing building costs and productivity concerns, and incentivise sector growth and development. There are also concerns over inconsistent practices and building code interpretations across the 67 building consenting authorities (BCAs), a barrier to standardisation of design, construction techniques and build quality.
Proposal for building consent authority reform
In what would be the most significant shake-up of the building consent system since the 1991 reforms, the Government is exploring three key changes:
When asked by Newstalk ZB about the timing of possible legislation, the Minister said:
Whether we are going along the lines of allowing councils that already want to band together and have done some work along those lines … that would be relatively short, that would be as early as the start of next year… but if you were going to more of a single point of contact across the country, potentially setting up a new entity for doing that, then maybe its going to be a bit longer, either way we want to move really quickly, we’ve been having conservations all year about it, it’s not like this is the start line, we are quite well advanced, even though we are saying now formally we want to engage and get some thoughts on those particular three options we’ve narrowed down to.
Arguably, the most significant part of Minister Penk’s announcement is that the Government is also reviewing liability settings, with an opportunity to reconsider the liability of BCAs and the duties of care owned by BCAs under the new regime. If these changes were to gain traction, they have the potential to bar claims against BCAs (as is already the case in some other jurisdictions) or limit such claims. The ability to bring claims against BCAs for negligence in relation to building consent activities has become part of the New Zealand legal and construction landscape over the past few decades, with regular actions being brought against BCAs. Legislative intervention to protect BCAs from claims in negligence represents a “watch this space” event for the whole construction sector.
In the Minister’s opinion, the risk of negligence claims has led to BCAs taking a conservative and risk-averse approach, negatively impacting productivity, increasing construction costs and delaying project consenting and completion. He states that the Government’s overarching ambition is to move towards a more enabling, risk-based and proportionate approach to consenting.
Immediate changes (minor variations)
On 1 October 2024, the Minister announced immediate changes to the Building Regulations to clarify the definition of a “minor variation” and introduce a definition of “minor customisation”. These changes are part of a move to enable small changes (such as the substitution of products) to be made to building plans without the need to apply for a building consent amendment, introducing greater flexibility for architects, builders and owners.
Public consultation
This was followed on 2 October 2024, by the Government’s release of its public discussion document, setting out wider proposals to reduce delays in the building inspection process. Previously signalled in July, the document centres around plans to increase the use of remote inspections to make the building and consenting process more efficient and affordable. The implementation of remote inspections by default seeks to improve productivity by reducing the need for inspectors to travel, in turn allowing more inspections to take place in a day, and resources to be shared across regions, improving access, efficiency and consistency.
Public consultation is now open and will run until 29 November 2024. BCAs, homeowners and other construction stakeholders are encouraged to offer feedback on options which include:
This overhaul takes place in the context of the Government’s broader reforms to the building sector, including such as promoting competition in the building supplies industry through the introduction of the Building (Overseas Building Products, Standards, and Certification Schemes) Amendment Bill, on which the Transport and Infrastructure Committee is currently receiving public submissions until 14 November 2024.
Get in touch
Reform of this scale is rare and the implications will be wide-reaching. Greenwood Roche will be following these developments closely, supporting our clients to submit on and navigate the changes. Reach out to one of our team below for advice on how these changes could impact your projects. Clicking on their name below will take you through to their profile on our website where you will find their contact details.
Barry Walker, Amy Rutherford, James Riddoch, Rob Harris, Vimal Nair, Geoff White, Jordan Ropati, Tanya Young
Go to https://www.mbie.govt.nz/have-your-say/consultation-on-increasing-the-use-of-remote-inspections-in-the-building-consent-process for the discussion document.
The Court of Appeal has recently overturned a decision of the High Court concerning the extent to...
The Court of Appeal has recently overturned a decision of the High Court concerning the extent to which a purchaser can rely on representations regarding the NBS rating of a commercial building contained in an Initial Seismic Assessment, in circumstances where those representations turn out to be incorrect. While the High Court found that the representations in that case amounted to a misrepresentation under section 35 of the Contract and Commercial Act 2017, the Court of Appeal disagreed with that decision, restoring the principle of buyer beware in relation to seismic matters in sale and purchase transactions.
If you would like to know more about this case or require advice in connection with the sale of a commercial building, please contact Kelly Johnson or Mark Anderson from our property and real estate team.
In this article we explain some of the key aspects to check as potential purchasers of renewable...
In this article we explain some of the key aspects to check as potential purchasers of renewable energy projects – particularly solar farms – are lured with “ready to build” developments.
Numerous small (and often reasonably recently formed) entities are touting for sale interests in renewable energy farms in New Zealand, particularly solar farms, some with battery storage. Their targets are mainly overseas developers with deep pockets and little familiarity with New Zealand laws or energy markets.
Our experience in acting for purchasers on several of these reveals differing levels of readiness in projects described as secured, consented and otherwise ready to build.
Aspects to check in particular are:
To talk about investing in a renewable energy project with experienced lawyers, please contact Brigid McArthur, Nick Dunn or Vimal Nair.
On 7 March 2024, the Government announced proposed amendments to the Overseas Investment Act 2005...
On 7 March 2024, the Government announced proposed amendments to the Overseas Investment Act 2005 (Act) to create a new streamlined approval pathway for build-to-rent (BTR) housing developments, and on 11 June 2024, the amendment Bill was introduced.
Build to Rent Developments
BTR developments are a form of privately-owned rental housing comprising 20 or more dwellings, which are ordinarily owned and professionally managed long-term by an institutional investment entity such as a pension fund. The rentals are typically for longer term tenancies, giving tenants increased housing certainty, reliable property maintenance services and access to shared development amenities such as cafes, gyms, media rooms and co-working spaces.
BTR developments are increasingly popular in Australia and the United Kingdom. While it is a newer housing model in New Zealand with only 22 registered developments so far, it is believed there is high potential for growth in the sector.
Industry groups such as the Property Council have been advocating for changes to the Act in order to increase affordable rental stock in New Zealand, and reduce investment barriers for New Zealand and overseas developers and institutional investor owners. BTR developments are currently viewed as a risky investment as a potentially stranded or illiquid asset class. There is little incentive to build or buy a BTR development considering the risk that developers may be stranded with the asset if New Zealand investors have insufficient capital to acquire it, and overseas investors face strict hurdles to entry under the Act. It is hoped that streamlining the test will increase both overseas and New Zealand investor confidence in BTR developments, with greater certainty that investors can exit and on-sell to a larger pool of purchasers.
Current Position
Currently, under the Act, applications for the creation of new BTR developments, or the acquisition of existing BTR developments, must proceed under either:
The Amendment Bill
The much anticipated Bill was released on 11 June 2024, setting out the proposed new streamlined pathway, called the “large rental development test”.
The large rental development test is for residential but not otherwise sensitive land being acquired as an existing large rental development (provided investor requirements are met). It will allow the acquisition of existing developments that are not increasing the housing supply, to proceed under the large rental development pathway, rather than the benefit to New Zealand test. This is intended to reduce the illiquidity risk of developers being unable to on-sell BTR developments where an investor would have to otherwise increase the housing supply to qualify for the streamlined increased housing test.
Land which is otherwise sensitive, will still need to proceed under the benefit to New Zealand test. The existing streamlined pathway under the increased housing test will continue to apply for new or expanding BTR developments which are increasing the housing supply.
The new test is also intended to enable other types of large rental developments that are functionally the same as BTR but may not be the same housing type, such as worker accommodation.
The large rental development test streamlines the consent process where:
Consent will be conditional on investors continuing to make at least 20 of the dwellings available for residential tenancy, otherwise the owner must divest their interest in the asset. Owners no longer need to be “in the business of providing residential dwellings” in the rent-to-buy or shared equity space, as they did previously.
There will be an opportunity to provide feedback on the Bill at the Select Committee stage.
Associate Minister of Finance Hon David Seymour’s Ministerial Directive Letter to the OIO on 6 June 2024 (Directive Letter)) which was a prelude to the Bill, together with the explanatory note in the Bill, emphatically encourages BTR housing developments as a means of addressing the housing crisis and attracting overseas investment. In anticipation of the Bill being passed later in the year, the Minister has directed the OIO to consider investment in housing supply and the operation of existing large scale housing developments as a benefit under the benefit to New Zealand test. The Minister considers that the benefits that flow from addressing the risk of stranded assets and from the continued operation of an existing large scale housing development may be sufficient to satisfy the benefit to New Zealand test even if no other benefits will result from the investment.
The Directive Letter and the introduction of the Bill are a clear pronouncement to overseas investors of the Government’s support of BTR developments, indicating the doors are opening for increased investment in this space.
If you have any questions on the Bill, or are an overseas investor considering investing in BTR developments or land to develop in New Zealand, please contact Brigid McArthur, Ranui Calman, Annabel Crawford or Anna Hickmott from our Overseas Investment team.
The Fast-track Approvals Bill (FTA Bill) - Government’s key legislative mechanism for accelerating...
The Fast-track Approvals Bill (FTA Bill) - Government’s key legislative mechanism for accelerating the delivery of nationally or regionally significant infrastructure and development projects - was introduced to Parliament last week and is now open for public submissions until Friday 19 April.
The “bones” of the new approval process as set out in the FTA Bill are broadly similar to the COVID-19 Recovery (Fast-track Consenting) Act 2020 (COVID Act), which was responsible for the consenting of some 66+ projects generating nearly 60,000 full time equivalent jobs across New Zealand over its four-year life-span. The COVID Act process also provided the template for the fast-track process within the Natural and Built Environment Act 2023, which has survived repeal of that Act, albeit only for the time being.
Given the similarities between the processes, in this update we have focused on some notable departures from the COVID Act process (as currently drafted, but subject to the Select Committee submission process still to come) below:
1. Pathways (or “tracks”) – As with the COVID Act, projects must first be recognised or approved as qualifying projects in order to access the fast-track consenting process. The ultimate decision-making authority for that qualifying stage lies with the “joint Ministers”, generally being the Ministers for Infrastructure, Transport, and Regional Development.
A project can qualify for referral to the fast-track process via the following pathways:
(a) The “open” pathway. Anyone may apply to the joint Ministers for a project to be referred, subject to a number of criteria that a project must meet to be considered for referral (discussed further below).
(b) The “listed” pathway. This pathway (which is actually two pathways) is intended to create what Minister Bishop has described as a “pipeline of projects” whereby the fast-track process is made available projects which “may not be economic right now”, but will realise significant national or regional benefits if and when they become viable for delivery.
The “pipeline” is divided into two categories:
(i) “Schedule 2, Part A listed projects”. These projects do not need an application for referral. The relevant “authorised person” (to be noted within Schedule 2, Part A) may simply issue a request to the EPA that all or part of those projects are referred for fast-track consenting. The EPA cannot decline that request.
(ii) “Schedule 2, Part B listed referred projects”. These projects are considered to have “nationally or regionally significant benefits” and may be referred directly to the fast-track process by joint Ministers in accordance with the process set out in the FTA Bill.
These Schedules will be populated prior to enactment of the Bill and will be selected by Cabinet on the recommendation of a Fast Track Advisory Group. There will be an opportunity to apply to the Group for admission of a project to that Schedule, subject to meeting certain criteria which will be published in the coming weeks.
2. Decision-makers – The FTA Bill significantly expands the decision-making power of Ministers. Of particular note, expert consenting panels will no longer have the final say over the grant of consent for referred projects; that responsibility now sits with the joint Ministers, with expert consenting panels reduced to a recommending role on the application for the approval (including any conditions). Importantly, unlike the timeframes in place for expert consenting panel decisions, there are no statutory timeframes for Ministerial decisions, which (in our experience of the referral phase of the COVID Act) can lead to a bottleneck in the process. There is, of course, a broader question as to the appropriateness (or otherwise) of Ministers having the final say on consenting decisions, even if the scope for “deviating” from an expert panel’s recommendations is limited. We expect that question will be the subject of detailed submissions during the Select Committee process.
3. Decision-making framework – The purpose of the FTA Bill is significantly more expansive, and pro-development, than prior fast-track regimes. The intent is to deliver a fast-track process to “facilitate the delivery of infrastructure and development projects with significant national or regional benefits”.
Considerations relevant to determining what constitutes “significant national or regional benefits” include whether the project:
(a) has been identified as a priority project in a central or local government or sector plan or strategy;
(b) will deliver regionally or nationally significant infrastructure or whether it will increase the supply of housing, address housing needs, or contribute to a well-functioning urban environment;
(c) will support primary industries or the development of natural resources, including minerals and petroleum;
(d) will support climate change mitigation or adaptation, resilience and recovery from natural hazards; and/or
(e) will address significant environmental issues.
Unlike the COVID Act, the FTA Bill establishes a clear hierarchy of decision-making criteria, starting with the purpose of the FTA Bill. That is followed by sections 5 – 7 of the RMA (with section 8, which requires decision-makers to have regard to the principles of Te Tiriti, notably absent), followed in turn by the RMA’s hierarchy of planning documents. The requirement to separately consider those matters is somewhat at odds with the now well-established approach of effectively relying on the way in which those documents have implemented Part 2, unless there is some suggestion that the documents have not appropriately incorporated Part 2 outcomes.
One of the most controversial aspects of the FTA Bill is the absence of any reference to the principles of Te Tiriti. This is a significant departure from the approach taken in environmental legislation for the past 30 years, and is a major step change from the COVID Act and the now-repealed Natural and Built Environment Act 2023. Again, we anticipate this will be the subject of extensive submissions (both in support and opposition) during the Select Committee process.
4. Removing RMA constraints – Section 104D of the RMA (commonly referred to as the “gateway test”) will not apply to the assessment of resource consents under the FTA Bill. Notably – unlike the COVID Act – a project will not be ineligible for utilising the fast-track process on the basis that it includes an activity that is prohibited under the RMA and resource consent may be granted under the FTA Bill for prohibited activities or activities which are inconsistent with national directions. This represents a strong commitment from Central Government to substantially reduce perceived planning constraints on development and infrastructure projects of scale.
5. Approvals – Like the COVID Act, resource consent applications and notices of requirement may both be considered under the FTA Bill. (Plan changes are not available for fast-tracking.) Changes in conditions to consents granted under the FTA Bill will still need to processed under the RMA – somewhat incongruously to the “pipeline of projects” notion. The FTA Bill has, however, extended the type of approvals which may be sought through the fast-track process to include approvals, licences, permissions, clearances and other authorities under the Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga Act 2014, the Crown Minerals Act 1991, the Exclusive Economic Zone and Continental Shelf (Environmental Effects) Act 2012, the Conservation Act 1987, the Reserves Act 1977, the Fisheries Act 1996 and the Wildlife Act 1953.
No changes have been made to the land acquisition process under the Public Works Act 1981, except to allow (but not require) the Environment Court, when hearing an objection to a proposal to take land, to accept a determination made under the fast-track process relating to the adequacy of consideration given to “alternative sites, routes, or methods of undertaking the work”. This is a relatively insignificant change and, for various reasons, may have limited benefit. We understand, from public statements made by Ministers, that more changes to the Public Works Act 1981 may be coming.
If you would like to know more about the Bill or require assistance in lodging a submission, please contact Francelle Lupis or Rachel Murdoch from our Resource Management team.
The Construction Contracts (Retention Money) Amendment Act 2023 came into force on 5 October...
The Construction Contracts (Retention Money) Amendment Act 2023 came into force on 5 October 2023, impacting the way retentions must be held. This FAQ answers the main queries we have been receiving from clients about complying with the new regime. Please click the link below for information on the changes.
What is an Incorporated Society? An incorporated society is a membership-based not-for-profit...
What is an Incorporated Society?
An incorporated society is a membership-based not-for-profit legal entity that was, up until 5 October 2023, required to be registered pursuant to the Incorporated Societies Act 1908 (Existing Act).
There are over 24,000 incorporated societies operating in Aotearoa New Zealand, many of which are sports clubs and associations.
New Act and Regulations
The Incorporated Societies Act 2022 (New Act) and its associated regulations (New Regulations) came into force on 5 October 2023. The New Act:
From 5 October 2023, all existing incorporated societies are required to re-register under the New Act, and they have until 5 April 2026 to do so (this is referred to as the “Transitional Period” under the new Act). The provisions of the New Act will not apply to an incorporated society until it has re-registered under the New Act (the provisions of the Existing Act will continue to apply to that society in the meantime). Any society which fails to re-register by 5 April 2026 will cease to exist after that date.
Any new society wanting to incorporate as an incorporated society must now register under the New Act.
Key changes
The following is a summary of the key changes introduced by the New Act:
o act in good faith and the best interests of the society;
o exercise powers for proper purposes only;
o comply with the New Act and the society’s constitution;
o exercise reasonable care and diligence;
o not create a substantial risk of serious loss to creditors; and
o not incur an obligation the officer does not reasonably believe the society can perform.
Officers are directly and personally liable to the incorporated society, whose members may apply
to the Court to enforce them. The New Act allows societies to keep and maintain insurance for
Officers in respect of such liability.
o make a false statement;
o fraudulently use or destroy property;
o falsify documents;
o defraud creditors;
o dishonestly operate under a name for which the word “Incorporated”, “Inc” or
“Manatopu” is the last word, when that organisation represented has not been
incorporated under the New Act or any other act allowing for the use of those words;
and
o breach a banning order (which is a court order disqualifying a person from being
an Officer of a society due to criminal or reckless conduct or incompetence etc.).
Comments
The changes introduced by the New Act are, in the main, likely to improve the way that sports clubs, associations and other not-for-profit organisations are governed in Aotearoa New Zealand.
The requirements of the New Act may not, for some of the larger and more sophisticated organisations, have a significant impact on governance practices. For smaller organisations (or those largely run by volunteers), the changes may be considerable and, in some cases, onerous: some may struggle to recruit and retain Officers particularly if there is little to no funding allowance for liability insurance. Others may struggle to meet the cost of compliance.
Societies should use the Transitional Period to ensure that they are in a position to be compliant with the New Act at the time of re-registration. This may include:
Societies should also consider the extent to which they wish to keep and maintain insurance for the liability of their Officers – it may otherwise be practically difficult to attract Officers to those roles, given the additional liability created by the new duties.
Please contact Kelly Johnson (or your usual contact at Greenwood Roche) if you have any queries in relation to the New Act and how it may affect your incorporated society.
Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington has pulled together principles of te ao...
Te Herenga Waka—Victoria University of Wellington has pulled together principles of te ao Māori and the Living Building Challenge (LBC) in an exciting marae precinct redevelopment on Kelburn Parade. Greenwood Roche are proud to have been involved in the pre-construction phase of this transformative construction project.
With construction well underway, 42 to 50 Kelburn Parade will soon be home to ‘The Living Pā’, a revolutionary marae precinct redevelopment and the latest addition to the University’s Kelburn campus. The 3000 sqm project will serve as an ‘incubator for innovation’ and a sustainability beacon that redefines our understanding of, and interaction with, the built environment.
The project is one of few striving for full ‘Living’ building certification in the Southern Hemisphere, the first mass timber building to do so, and the first amongst an urban environment. The LBC framework requires the pā to be net positive in carbon, water, energy and waste and demonstrably giving back to the local community and surrounding ecology.
The LBC requirements reflect te ao Māori principles such as kaitiakitanga (guardianship), whanaungatanga (kinship) and whakapapa (lineage). With Papaptūānuku under pressure, these principles have and will continue to have a profound influence on the project as it seeks the gold standard in sustainable building. The Living Pā intends to create a positive impact on the natural and human systems that interact with it, continuing long after construction is completed. Once completed, the pā aims to set the benchmark for future regenerative building projects.
Greenwood Roche assisted throughout the procurement process for this project, including to provide strategic procurement advice, draft and negotiate the early contractor involvement agreement and construction contract, and finalise the construction documents.
People
Nick is an experienced property lawyer, specialising in large scale development projects in a range...
James is a specialist construction lawyer with a particular focus on social infrastructure.Prior to...
Amy is a specialist construction lawyer who has experience across a range of energy, construction...
Jordan is a specialist construction lawyer with substantial experience across a wide range of...
Letitia acts for a number of government and large commercial sector clients, and undertakes a range...
Amelia joined Greenwood Roche in 2017 after working in the Resource Management team at a large...
Mariam Matti joined Greenwood Roche in 2022 after training in a top tier national law firm, and a...
Michelle joined Greenwood Roche in 2023 after working as a property and commercial lawyer for...
Contact Us
Full details are provided on the Contact us page.
Phone: +64 9 306 0490
Fax: +64 4 494 8501
Email: Email Us
Email: Email Us
Physical: Hayman Kronfeld Building
Level 6
15 Galway Street Auckland 1010
Mail: PO Box 106006
Auckland 1143
Map: Open a Google map
Phone: +64 3 353 0570
Fax: +64 4 494 8501
Email: Email Us
Email: Email Us
Physical: Level 3, 1 Kettlewell Lane
680-690 Colombo Street
Christchurch 8011
Mail: PO Box 139
Christchurch 8140
Map: Open a Google map
Phone: +64 4 494 8500
Fax: +64 4 494 8501
Email: Email Us
Email: Email Us
Physical: Level 13
36 Customhouse Quay
Wellington 6011
Mail: PO Box 25501
Wellington 6140
Map: Open a Google map
in the way Greenwood Roche operates. From the outset we have focused on clearly defined specialist areas, retaining highly respected legal experts in each field. We then take that further; ensuring clients have direct and regular access to the most senior partners and lawyers, in a cost efficient manner.
Close contact with experts and clear cost advantages
We advise on a range of significant public and private sector projects. To ensure our specialists are always where they’re needed, we operate as one office with hubs in Auckland, Wellington & Christchurch.